Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lebowski painting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Lebowski painting

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Mere mention on Wil Wheaton's blog does not make something notable. DreamGuy (talk) 15:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find any references whatsoever that would establish notability for this.  This is the first time, however, that I've seen someone try to cite twitter as a source.  Rnb (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No references, notability not established.  freshacconci  talk talk  19:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable fancruft. "this is the first time, however, that I've seen someone try to cite twitter as a source" --- I'm sure we'll be seeing more of this. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising for a commercial poster, references are to various blogs that have copied text from the online shop (viral campaign?). All the sources and references appear to fail WP:GNG. Enki H. (talk) 17:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's an advert. Delete, can always be recreated should it achieve notability, or if new shit comes to light. pablo hablo. 22:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.