Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ledo Degtinė


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Mmmmm Vodka, sorry just thinking out loud. It appears that the wheeze of nominating this for deletion in order to force improvements has failed. There does appear to be sufficient claim to notability to preclude deleting this for the lack of sources at this AFD and since no-one seems to feel strongly about deleting it, I think we can give it some time to grow. A continuing lack of sources would certainly significantly count against the article were we to see it back at AFD again. Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Ledo Degtinė

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a vodka was blanked by anon claiming no sources; it has apparently received some awards which may be sourceable, but is it WP:N? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I wish this sub was as clean as the subject claims to be, but it appears to be valid and notable per awards. Not technically spam, just unsourced and new.  Tag it and throw back into the water, or vodka, as it were. :-) Bearian (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed, not spam. I don't feel as strongly about deleting this as other nominations hence no Delete in the nomination but this process should flesh out sources as I don't speak or read the language in which such sources are likely to be found. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.