Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee (River City) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to River City. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Lee (River City)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

second AfD, since the first one was no consensus; fails WP:GNG. Ironholds (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per DGG's comment at last AfD. This really doesn't even need to be here unless the merge has been tried and an editor has reverted it. Jclemens (talk) 20:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I don't see evidence that a merge was attempted, and it would be problematic to do so given the current format of that list. But, looking at this article, all I'm seeing is an unsourced plot summary, so I'm not sure how much could profitably be merged into a list. A redirect points the article to the list, and preserves the history if someone wants to make a go at a proper merge and expansion of the list. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect- like Ultraexactzz, I cannot see anything that can be legitimately merged into anything since none of it is sourced. Reyk  YO!  08:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.