Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Baldry (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Lee Baldry
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Declined as a PROD and BLPPROD'd before I arrived at the article, I was obliged to decline the BLPPROD based on that policy's strict nomination criteria. I added the passing reference I found when I looked myself, but was unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide significant coverage of this presenter, which suggests that the article does not meet the general notability guideline. 3rd time at AfD, the last one was a delete in 2008, I'd suggest consideration of the question of whether salt should be applied here, I don't have a strong opinion on that. --joe deckertalk to me 17:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete. The article contains too much text even though it's support by ONE mention in a Reuters article. There's a chance more sources may surface, but it can go either way. Hopefully, a fourth nomination won't happen, and it can just be taken care once and for all. SwisterTwister (talk) 21:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.