Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Burras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (not notable). RockMagnetist (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Lee Burras

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF. M. Caecilius (talk) 21:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTE no evidence of notability of this particular individual. Amortias (T)(C) 21:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence is provided that he meets WP:ACADEMIC.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  22:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no evidence of notability given. Sigh. there are good student projects on Wikipedia, honestly. but this isn't one of them. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. He seems to be an asset to his university, but that's different from being notable here. The citation record isn't strong enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF and what else is there? —David Eppstein (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources either. Agricola44 (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.