Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Cockerell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Lee Cockerell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've been working on this article for a while trying to improve it, and I've noticed now that I've removed all the references to the subject's personal website, all that remains is vaguely promotional. The remaining reference is a blog/interview with the subject. Attempting to search for references is only coming back with seminars on leadership. Additionally, the article was created by (only contribution) and later expanded by,  and  --  samtar whisper 12:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm not seeing any independent sources and this is a BLP. Andrew D. (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: I'm trying out a new AfD format as suggested here by --  samtar whisper 12:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have removed the section headings which break the layout of the daily pages such as WP:AFD/T. Such a structure is contrary to WP:AFDEQ which states "Do not reorder comments on the deletion page to group them by keep/delete/other. Such reordering can disrupt the flow of discussion, polarize an issue, and emphasize vote count or word count."  Andrew D. (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah understood, apologies -- samtar whisper 13:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --  samtar whisper 12:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. --  samtar whisper 12:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --  samtar whisper 12:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No non-trivial third party coverage with sufficient coverage to demonstrate any kind of notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now at best as he would be best mentioned at another article, instead of having his own article himself, with no solid signs of better notability here. SwisterTwister   talk  01:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.