Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Holden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Lee Holden

 * – ( View AfD View log )

See issues. MrEarlGray (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No useful independent sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Purely promotional. I'd say it probably meets CSD G11. — F ORMAL D UDE  ( talk ) 04:10, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG. Yinglong999 (talk)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, but even if it did pass it's such a promotional article it would likely have to be deleted via WP:TNT and then recreated. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete My search didn't find evidence that he meets WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or any SNG. Papaursa (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: I strongly believe it should be deleted because reliable sources are week and this article written just for advertisement purpose. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.