Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Hysan Hall (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Accommodation_at_the_University_of_Hong_Kong. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  14:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Lee Hysan Hall
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable residence hall, with intricate detail that would be of no interest except to students or prospective students. The residential colleges of some world famous universities are notable, but even they do not contain such absurd detail as a photo of the photocopying machine. Normally we would call this sort of detail promotional. The previous afd closed as Redirect to the list of residence halls, at the university, but the article was recreated.  DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 3 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, and then make a redirect page. Clearly not  notable. Fails WP:ORG.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect per the first AfD. ansh 666 20:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Accommodation_at_the_University_of_Hong_Kong and protect This is clearly not independently notable. I personally think a redirect works well here. It would be good to protect the redirect so that it cannot be recreated again. (Deletion of the history is not necessary actually).--Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Redirect as, while watching this from the start, I concur there's simply nothing at all for each their own articles, simply because they're trivial and nothing else significant is established, let alone convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  08:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * For this case, I would prefer to keep the history though. The content, while not adequately sourced, can used to expand another article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.