Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Ka-eun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to After School (group). A clear consensus for redirection has formed here. North America1000 10:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Lee Ka-eun
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:SINGER and WP:NACTOR. As a solo singer, she released only one uncharted song, while for passing WP:NACTOR you need to "have significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" which she obviously doesn’t have, she had only one supporting role so far. Individual notability outside of her band is not shown. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to band. Individual notability is not sufficient for a separate article. Coolbruh123 has reinstated this article five times, against the objections of four other editors. It's time this was made to stick. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Elmidae. signed,Rosguill talk 17:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nominator. Have to agree - one acting role and a member of the band, no significant notability from either. Nothing significant as a solo singer yet. Evaders99 (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect, being one of the four editors who has already redirected the article. Elmidae's analysis is spot on. Might also suggest protection from recreation without admin approval. Onel 5969  TT me 21:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.