Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Pei Fen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 05:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Lee Pei Fen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, generic material. What little content in the article does not discuss and/or show how she is notable within the Getai industry. Paul 1953 (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This AfD was not started correctly, I have added it to today's log. -- Patchy1 23:51, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I would hope we can get a Wikipedian who is from Singapore and/or a Getai fan to comment before reaching a conclusion. Bacchiad (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And provide a reference. – Wdchk (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

If you just read the article, she is not notable and a delete. If you know S'pore, she is somewhat well known and a keep.Bamler2 (talk) 07:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete article does not assert notability at all. There's not much to go on, but the low number of fans in the linked Facebook group doesn't suggest there's much notability there. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unable to establish notability from reliable, independent sources. WWGB (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability not established. Article lacks of reliable sources. --LlamaAl (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.