Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Smith (rugby league)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep - the duplicate articles were merged. Non-admin closure.  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 20:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Lee Smith (rugby league)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Duplicate of information held at Lee Smith (rugby league footballer) Julianhall 16:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete - Appears to be no new information.  Tiddly - Tom  19:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Can the article on Lee Smith (rugby league footballer) be merged in here. Short titles are better than long ones and there should be a redirect so that the same thing doesn't happen again. Capitalistroadster 02:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment That seems to be a better idea than deletion, actually. The Lee Smith (rugby league footballer) article has more information, but i believe that this is a better page name.Julianhall 14:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment so copy the information across, and create a re direct with the other page? Make sure, when copied across, any links to the old page are directed this this one instead.  Tiddly - Tom  17:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment That definitely seems the best course of action. There are a lot of pages that link to the page that a re-direct would be going on, and i don't understand how to amend some of these. They're all contained within a "squad box" (you can see this on the Lee Smith (rugby league footballer) page for example), which i don't know how to edit.Julianhall 10:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That should not be a problem, you can edit it here  Tiddly - Tom  17:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Done, thanks for your help. I've deleted the AfD box from the page, but will leave this open until my changes have been looked at. Cheers.Julianhall 23:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.