Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Stone (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. – Rich Farmbrough 19:42, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Lee Stone (porn star)
Not a encyclopedia article --Mosesofmason 14:30, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite. The current contents read like an advertisement. Was this written by Lee Stone himself? &mdash; J I P | Talk 14:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. advertising. may also be copyvio --Inteloutside 15:03, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio. I've marked it as such. Pburka 17:04, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite and Keep as there are plenty of other porn stars on Wikipedia why delete just this one? CambridgeBayWeather 05:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As this article currently stands, it's a mess -- but a fixable mess. This version is the copyright violation -- which should be promptly handled with a delete & replace by a later version. (Let's get that information out of the history logs.) However, this later version is nothing more than a list of Stone's vital statistics & some of the movies he's appeared in -- although the photo may be a copyvio, that's another topic. Assuming this vote concerns the later version, I believe it should be labelled, & the information put into grammatical sentences. -- llywrch 23:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per llywrch. Copyvio problems appear to be resolved.  Article is now legit and just needs to be cleaned up and wikified.  Psy guy (talk) 03:09, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per llywrch. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-10-5 T 01:20:50 Z
 * Keep per Llywrch. C HAIRBOY (☎) 21:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.