Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Vandervis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Lee Vandervis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person who got elected to a position that doesn't grant notability. Drmies (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, is notable in Dunedin and has attained significant media coverage. Wipkipkedia (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. 22:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC) - gadfium 22:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable position, non-notable person, the fact that he's notable in a town does not grant him worldwide notability. Buggie111 (talk) 23:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Change per Schwede and Dweller. Buggie111 (talk) 13:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Appears to fall below the level required. - SimonLyall (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLITICIAN. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I can understand why everybody else (other than the article's creator) has voted delete so far, but this guy is so outspoken that he gets regular coverage in The Press, which is published in Christchurch and is not a Dunedin newspaper. The article at this point makes no attempt to demonstrate notability, though. I'll put some references on the article's talk page as a starting point for expansion. If the decision is to remove the article, I suggest that it be userfied.  Schwede 66  20:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as should easily meet notability with more detail, as per Schwede66. NealeFamily (talk) 03:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to pass WP:GNG, which trumps POLITICIAN --Dweller (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Appears to pass the GNG, if you consider Talk:Lee Vandervis. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:48, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Updated article with references from National news agencies and more information. NealeFamily (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.