Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Westwick (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Lee Westwick
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:N. red dogsix (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NACTOR, has only had minor roles and no significant coverage online from WP:RS. The abundant fluff about his social life by the WP:SPA creator, and the previously deleted article's history, both suggest autobiography or WP:COI. That can be cleaned up easily, but the problem of notability will remain. Dai Pritchard (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  22:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete minor actor who lacks coverage to meet notability guidelines for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Not Delete I have looked at the guidelines and have taken away "Musician" feel not enough coverage and references to the subjects music. I have also further researched the subjects roles and story lines, added more references to show the subject is of significance & importance. I have re-read through the article and made the grammar and information about the subject more clearer. GabSalciute (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Not Delete I have researched more adding more references, also after reading the guidelines I can see from my first edit how people would of perceived the subject to be a person with minor roles. possiblly in my wording not making it clear that the subject started out as a background artist, then from that the subject was cast into lead roles. The subject has had significant roles in multiple television shows, the subject also has a large fan base sourced from social media and the internet. The Bill and the subject still to this day has a "Cult" following due to the re-runs of the soap opera. The Bill also has a "Convention" in which they invite Actors from the show to appear, also the "Cult" following want to see the popular soap opera return to the screens of ITV. I am still researching more about The Bill and would like to further contribute to wikipedia GabSalciute (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.