Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was de-leeb. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 04:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Leeb
This article was originally PROD'd as a neologism, and the deletion was contested and the notice removed. As I understand it, the article should now have a proper AFD. Personally, I believe it's a neologism/non-notable term, there is no evidence of why this is important, or any references. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 00:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO unless reliably sourced. -- Kinu t /c  00:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and Merge A google search shows up several references to it. But the question arises. If this added will it become part of the lexicon or is it already? What i'm saying is that if this is added to the leet article people may start using it. Wikipedia in essence would be responsible for creating something that wasn't there before. (sort of like Anthropologists and African Tribes)--Aliwalla 08:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. When Google searched, neither 1338 nor Leeb bring up anything on the subject. --Daniel Olsen 00:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete... uh, huh, sure. Per nom.  Nuff said. Danny Lilithborne 01:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. You understand it correctly, AfD is the next step. VoiceOfReason 02:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability, or even evidence of existence, of the term. Definite neologism -Elmer Clark 03:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete My reasons have been stated by the people above me. Crimson Shadow 06:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - all the above really Nigel (Talk) 12:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

 The below comments were moved from Talk:Leeb -- VoiceOfReason 16:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete&mdash;If I could see any notable plaec that actually used 1338 as a legitimate term, I might be inclined to merge. As it is, I've never heard of this so I'd say get rid of it. —Ragdoll 19:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I think that I might have heard of it, so I support a merge. It might just be in a single game though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.222.244.83 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 30 August 2006

Delete &mdash; No such term that I've ever been aware of. Khaighle 15:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete &mdash; Never heard of this term, ans i suspect that it's only used by a small group of people who all play the same online game -- 12.4.81.145 15:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * i dont know what you people are talking about. leeb is a very obscure but nonetheless useful term — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.154.107.121 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 31 August 2006
 * Comment: There's no such thing as WP:USEFUL. There are, however, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NEO. -- Kinu  t /c  05:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. So wait, what the heck is leeb? Is it even a real pseudodialect? bibliomaniac15 00:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism. (WP:NEO) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Deletel. Neat concept, but not notable enough yet. Cdean 14:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.