Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leeds Tigers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 21:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Leeds Tigers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unref and tagged for notability for 5 years Boleyn (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Seriously, folks?  An article for a community youth basketball team?  Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Oy vey. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yup, it does appear to be a potential candidate for A7 speedy deletion: no credible assertion of the organization's significance or importance. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - Clearly. Though the quality of play is probably only slightly worse than the British Basketball League ;-) Rikster2 (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment It is far from clear what league the adult team plays in.  This is not a major sport in UK, but the senior league clubs ought to have articles.  Local ones probably not.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.