Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was consensus that article should not exist as standalone; no consensus as to whether it should be deleted or merged, therefore merge. Babajobu 03:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Leets
gamecruft, put up for prod, but template deleted, so here we are on afd -- RoySmith (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, smells of vanispamcruftisement. Royboycrashfan 02:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mmm, crufty goodness. --Kinu 02:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are many articles on Wikipedia about creatures from computer games.  &rArr;  Jarlaxle Artemis   02:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as GameCruft and LeetCruft. You guys sure know how to have a good time... ++Deiz 02:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. Leets have quite a following with websites like Leets Roxxor and Leetville popping up. Some people even making plushie leets themselves and online comics featuring strips involving leets such as GU_Comics. --Thundera 02:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC) (The preceeding comment was written by the creator of the nominated page. All of this users edits have concerned the nominated page.)
 * Delete. Not an encyclopedic subject. Pilatus 02:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 03:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.Blnguyen 05:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Anarchy Online. It's apparently a creature in that game, and it doesn't appear to really warrant an article of it's own. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wingsandsword (talk &bull; contribs) 08:05, 6 February 2006.
 * Yeah, merge. Melchoir 08:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, gamecruft, not notable enough. And here I thought a leet was a vegetable... no, wait, that's a leek. J I P  | Talk 09:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect with Anarchy Online per WP:FICT. Please express opinions with a little more words. Being cruft is not a valid reason to delete. We do have a featured article on goombas, after all. - Mgm|(talk) 10:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Right, when I pick up an encyclopedia I love finding cruft-ridden crap in it... anyway, based on length, content, notability of subject and number of people familiar with / likely to be interested in the subject, comparing Goombas and Leets is impossible. ++Deiz 12:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So perhaps comparing these to goombas is a bit over the top. I still don't see why they should be deleted instead of merged. - Mgm|(talk) 22:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So merge... I do take exception to the fact that just because WP is a web-based entity people accept that WebCruft is more acceptable for inclusion... ++Deiz 00:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think wikipedia should try to encompass all knowledge, meaning goombas and leets and world of warcraft and everything else should be included. --Thundera 22:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Anarchy Online. Not notable enought for a standalone article.--Isotope23 18:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as per MacGyverMagic, otherwise delete as insignificant gamecruft. Lord Bob 18:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I would be ok with a merge and redirect to Anarchy Online if that would please you all. --Thundera 18:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Anarchy Online.-- Shella ° 22:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Anarchy Online although if someone can find a large online presence I would be inclined to change my vote to keep. (A google search turns up a little bit about them and a lot of other things. It is thus difficult to determine whether or not they deserve their own article. Possibly someone else knows more about this subject?) JoshuaZ 22:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Anarchy Online as per above. --bainer (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete. Appears to be game/fancruft. Not deserving of its own article. Stifle 11:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Leets are an important fixture in AO. Im sure if this was a WoW topic this would never have come to afd.--Pypex 15:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be famous. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Important enough topic to keep, although I would be Ok with a merge. Arundhati bakshi 21:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.