Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left with Uncertainty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-09 09:46Z 

Left with Uncertainty

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Author asserts notability based on a "new musical technique" or some such. I argue that using music to tell a story is not new, and this indie band is not sufficiently notable. Ginkgo100talk 22:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Qarnos 23:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Once the jargon and promotional material is stripped away, we're left with a one-man concept album act, which is hardly a new thing under the sun. Additionally, the band/project remains stubbornly non-notable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't satisfy WP:BAND, and no, the concept of telling a story through music is definitely not new. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  23:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any time I search for a band in Google and the first thing that pops up is their myspace page, that's a massive red flag. This is a vanity page like 99% of the band articles that get introduced on this site. Aplomado  talk 23:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I was the person who first inserted the Speedy Delete template. I was going to insert the reason later, but It's already been done. Oh well. Delete per nom. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 01:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.