Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leftist consensus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Deleted by someone else. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 03:49, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Leftist consensus

 * Poorly written dictionary definition. Gets 327 Google hits, top results aren't relevant to definition. Jkelly 00:39, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Nonsense, apparently created for vandalizing Global Warming. Delete. --Stephan Schulz 00:42, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - unencyclopaedic neologism created by vandal. Guettarda 00:42, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Seems to have been removed already. Jkelly 00:44, 15 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete for the above reasons and title is an inherentt POV until such time as the term actually comes into use. --Mysidia (talk) 01:57, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe even speedy. There is only one line. Notable? Encyclopedic???--Jondel 08:41, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  No opinion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is nothing more than one line expressing an opinion. Could not possibly be made NPOV. (Full disclosure: I am far from a leftist.) &spades; DanMS 19:38, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.