Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leg Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. EdJohnston (talk) 03:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Leg Show

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reason to suggest this porn mag is any different/more notable than five million other porn mags out there. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 19:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The former editor Dian Hanson arguably draws her fame from it, but there are many more mentions of her (in Google News Archive or Google Books) as editor (present or former) than of the magazine alone. I would suggest a merge to Mavety Media, which doesn't exist yet, but should easily meet WP:CORP. It's certainly one of the best-known (and all but coffee-table acceptable) of the fetish magazines out there (unless you count Barely Legal). --Dhartung | Talk 20:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep While I did believe that this magazine may not be notable, the comment above changed my mind. I went and did the same searches, and indeed, it does come up in lots of news stories.  The reason why I vote weak keep here is because of the fact that it is completely unreferenced.  If this was kept, it would need sources.  Razorflame 16:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.