Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal Robot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Legal Robot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

trivial awards, trivial refs. An award for 100 startups most likely to scale " is an excellent indication of not yet notable Most of the refs are connected with the subject .  DGG ( talk ) 23:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per . Also, I taught law office management for 19 years, and wrote dozens of legal articles here, yet I've never heard of them. Bearian (talk) 15:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, though I could be persuaded otherwise if other instances of in-depth coverage appear. This piece on Stanford Law School's blog is all about the start-up; if three or four more like that appear then I'd be satisfied with the depth of coverage.  A  Train ''talk 15:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.