Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal drugs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. Ben W Bell  talk  16:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Legal drugs
This entire article is a POV rant soapbox conspiracy exercise initiated by an author who is meeting opposition elsewhere on Wikipedia to putting forward his pro-drug/anti-US POV edits to articles. Ben W Bell  talk  07:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete information is already covered by other articles. Arbusto 07:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The "opposition elsewhere on Wikipedia" is an exaggeration of a campaign directed by Ben W Bell (who also likes to say "every historian in the world concurs with my POV" and ad populums like those), for putting forward his anti-certain-drugs/pro-US POV edits to articles. The soapboxers are prohibitionists trying to defend naive propaganda such as that saying "alcohol is not a drug". These people are taking credibility and editability out from Wikipedia and back to main-stream Republican Conservative POVs Drcaldev 09:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete bizarre soapboxing. Gazpacho 09:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Badly written, entirely un-sourced and so POV it hurts. OBM | blah blah blah 09:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete before anyone sees it. It might also be noted that Drcaldev is the creator and sole maintainer of the article in question. Ultra-Loser Talk Comparison of BitTorrent sites 09:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V.-- danntm T C 14:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a place to publish your opinions, a publisher of original thought. -- IslaySolomon 14:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an encyclopedic article. Pavel Vozenilek 14:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete POV? You're soaking in it. Wildthing61476 16:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hopelessly POV. ---Charles 17:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopaedic POV soapboxing. -- Necrothesp 17:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per everyone above and end debate now per WP:SNOW. --Aaron 16:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.