Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legend: Legacy of the Dragons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to VK (company). Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Legend: Legacy of the Dragons
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This game doesn't seem to be notable. I searched on Google news and it's all just pages about different games with the same name. Also, this page is written like an advertisement : things like "The most notable difference in Legend: Legacy of the Dragons to most other games of this genre is the fight system which is animated and allows for great tactical depth." - "great tactical depth" is subjective. Finally, most of the article is about game mechanics, not reception or development or anything real-world related. Jannaultheal (talk) 18:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seawolf35 T--C 06:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to VK (company) (i.e. by creating a "Games" section). It got mentioned here and here and here, which is enough to show it exists and merit a mention in the article, but doesn't appear standalone notable, though other language sources may exist for it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: per sources brought by ZVCQFX. Merge discussion can be left to other venue like the talk pages. बिनोद थारू (talk) 04:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge per Zxcvbnm. Disagree with the assessment that it should be kept since only GamesTM is WP:SIGCOV. OceanHok (talk) 11:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. The sources lack reliable significant coverage about the game itself. Of the above sources, none review the game. Only the Games Industry article is a reliable source that describes the content of the game. There is enough to adequately merge into the developer's article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 03:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.