Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''Delete only this one. This other articles were not tagged with AfD notices.''' --Stephen 08:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Note I'm also nominating all the articles in that Yu-Gi-Oh trading card template, with the exception of the main article. All of these decks has no claim of meeting WP:N, it's mostly a list of cards that those decks contains, which also fails WP:NOT, nothing to merge, it's unsourced to boot Delete all. Secret account 22:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom SaveThePoint (talk) 01:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Procedural point: None of the supposed other articles have the AfD notice on them. If this is a bundled nomination, it is incomplete. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 04:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm not clear yet, does Secret mean that all of the articles on Template:Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game sets are being co-nominated in this AfD, or that he plans on making another AfD? -- Ned Scott 05:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * All the articles in the template. Secret account 20:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * All of the articles require a deletion notice. This remains an incomplete nomination. -- Ned Scott 01:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not sure if this should be under the "anime and manga-related" header, since these articles are about the card game and not the show. But yeah, delete this. JuJube (talk) 08:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * When I sorted it, I wasn't aware of the Yu-go-oh! Wikiproject -- which turns out to be a child of the Anime and Manga Wikiproject, among others. I've also put a notice on the project talk page. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge all Once you delete the card list which crosses the line of WP:NOT and doesn't actually add anything to the article except to take up space, what you have left is a sub. These stubs can be merged into a much larger article with the proper sourcing. --Farix (Talk) 16:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This will be my final edit to Wikipedia, so I am going to go down defending this article. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia. Encyclopedias contain information about useless items. Wikipedia contains useless articles. This article is not useless. There will be articles kept that hardly anyone except the creator knows about. People know about this article. Last but not least, you editors have nothing better to do than to delete articles you do not deem "worthy". Wikipedia has this problem and that is why I'm stepping down from my position as an editor. Delete the articles if you wish, but if it is kept remember what I said about the other articles that are known about. Red Director (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * We delete articles based if it doesn't meet policy, which this doesn't, not because we don't like it. Secret account 20:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all non-notable fancruft. 70.55.91.243 (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all, Wikipedia is not a gaming guide and this falls squarely into the sort of detailed info on a deck that belongs in a guide on the TCG game and is really nothing more than a duplicate of the official card listing with a little original research and opinion tossed in. Collectonian (talk) 05:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Madman (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.