Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legend of gatorface


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, nominator withdraws nomination with the only contributors wanting to keep the article (non admin close). Guest9999 (talk) 11:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Legend of gatorface

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No asserted notability in article or in some (admittedly cursory) searching. Seems to be a real movie (though the proper title is "The Legend of Gatorface"), but not one with any substantive background. - Vianello (Talk) 03:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  --  pablo hablo. 13:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment as Vianello states, if kept, this should be moved to The Legend of Gator Face. pablo hablo. 13:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep and rename the now improved article, as it meets the inclusion reqirements of WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The New York Times and Rotten Tomatoes both thought it notable enough to have reviews for it.  D r e a m Focus  21:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep (reversal of previous stance). This has been substantially improved since its initial submission and notability has been clearly asserted. I would like to restate my stance as being that this article should be kept. Hats off to the clean-up crew on this one. - Vianello (Talk) 03:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep And hats off to you Vianello for changing your view in the Face of new evidence! FeydHuxtable (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.