Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legendmaker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. TravellingCari 01:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Legendmaker

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Role-playing game. No suggestion of wide repute or notability, nor any sources other than a single Web review suggesting otherwise. Seems indistinguishable from an advert. CalendarWatcher (talk) 11:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, with only one substantial article anywhere. Even the official website has no mention of reviews or notoriety, which would be very unusual for anything that had such mentions. Also note that "LegendMaker" appears to be the name of a Chinese company. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 03:41, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient coverage to pass WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: obviously non-notable. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 08:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Google searches would indicate this RPG just isn't notable. RMHED (talk) 22:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.