Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lehren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  14:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Lehren

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability here. The usual own web-site links plus several press releases about take overs, and peripheral mentions in articles about other things. Nothing here that adds up to notability.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure on notability, but I am adding some sources where I can find them. It's an Indian company, so I am guessing that English web searches may not be the best way of finding references. Basil Monster 22:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basil Monster (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - Upon further research, this is a broadcast television station (see here : www.india-forums.com/tellybuzz/news-releases/2070-lehren-india-first-24x7-showbiz-news-and-entertainment-channel.htm). Under Notability_(media), a television station that serves Mumbai, India would count as a television station serving a major regional market. The quote of interest would be: "The vast majority of over-the-air television stations serve a large regional market, often covering millions of households ... Because of the public interest served, most television stations that produce original content should be presumed notable for Wikipedia purposes." Sources are sparse here, but notability protocols would seem to indicate that Lehren is notable. It should, I think, be transitioned to a page about the station possibly to clarify this. Wikipedia could also transition this to talk about the Lehren nationally broadcast television show from the 1990s. That would qualify under the same policy. Basil Monster 22:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basil Monster
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.