Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lei Wulong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Characters of the Tekken series. ✗ plicit  11:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Lei Wulong

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Outside of one good reference, which is used in a quote box no less, the rest of the sources are honestly terrible, and I haven't been able to find anything else for the character. Even checking sources like Scholar just brings up a few small mentions but nothing with meat on them. This fails notability unfortunately. Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Police-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge. The Kotaku source is good, but other than that, it's too weak, sadly. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge Unfortunately the reception has no teeth, just the usual cookie-cutter character-ranking content and even less total than Lucky Chloe (though the bizarre comparison to Jar Jar Binks is admittedly remarkable). Seconding the notion that Kotaku is the only thing worth salvaging. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  07:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak merge: One of the few Tekken character AFDs I can actually get behind. He does seem to have a little notoriety in being based on Jackie Chan, and maybe with one or two more good sources, I would argue for a keep, but for the time being, I'm unopposed to a merge. MoonJet (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.