Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leicester City Centre bus stops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. This article was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user and is speedy deletable per WP:CSD. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 22:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Leicester City Centre bus stops

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Its a list of bus stops within a city. I'm not sure how this can be in any way encyclopaedic, and almost definitely falls under the definition of being a travel guide! Jenuk1985 |  Talk  18:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * [Keep] This article should NOT be deleted because it is NOT a TRAVEL GUIDE and why should it be deleted just becasuse some one thinks it is a travel guide well why is there an article for St Margarets Bus Station ??? thanks Sowhyman (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC) (Note: I (Jenuk1985) have struk out this vote, as the user has made a delete vote below)
 * (edit conflict) So you remove the AfD template? Drmies (talk) 18:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Bus stations can have information on their history, layout, any events etc about them, and so can be important. Public information like this cannot. Anyway, Other stuff exists isn't a valid reason to keep this. Arriva436talk/contribs 18:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, definitely. It certainly is a travel guide, and cannot be encyclopedic. It's basically the same as this. Arriva436talk</b>/<b style="color:#800080;">contribs</b> 18:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless there is some special policy on bus routes that I'm not aware of, this topic is not notable. Wikipedia is not a travel guide or a directory. Bus stations are, apparently, notable topics. This is not. Try and find some in-depth discussion in reliable sources of this bus route--it'll be difficult. Drmies (talk) 18:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * (another edit conflict)
 * Delete per nom. Ironholds (talk) 18:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * KEEP JENUK1985 just though it was a bad idea and it is annoy coz they ALWAYS delete pages ! Sowhyman (talk (Note: I (Jenuk1985) have struk out this vote, as the user has made a delete vote below)
 * Sowhyman, English please. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * DELETE if the article is deleted could this link be posted on Arriva Fox County, Centrebus & First Leicester ? i will agree to this being delted  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sowhyman (talk • contribs) 18:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you try setting out your thoughts more logically, please? I can't understand what you are saying. Ironholds (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * DELETE arriva436 was right and there should be a link with this is the leicester network map ! Sowhyman (talk


 * This doesn't make any sense. Besides, Arriva436 said no such thing. And I signed a couple of times for you. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No encyclopedic value.--Michig (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * what i was saying was delete the page and put an external link on ARRIVA FOX COUNTY, FIRST LEICESTER & CENTREBUS WIKI pages with the link being : which USER ARRIVA436 NOTED Earlier ! Sowhyman (talk) 22:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I see--but why should Wikipedia have a link to your bus schedule? Arriva noted that this information is already available on the internet. Drmies (talk) 23:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Yinta ɳ   14:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete As noted above this is just a copy of the schedule brochure.-Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Question Would Haymarket bus station, Leicester be considered a valid article? (There is already a Haymarket bus station in Newcastle). Perhaps a new editor should be encouraged to contribute something that would not be trampled over and deleted - but it must have some history and prose, not just a table of routes.-Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. The information in this article has also been added to Haymarket Centre, Highcross Leicester, and St. Margaret's Bus Station. I would suggest that if this article is deleted, the duplicated content is also deleted from those articles, for the same reason of lack of encyclopedic value and WP:NOT.--Michig (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - The user has also now created Leicester bus stops 2009, practically the same. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  19:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ironholds got rid of that with a redirect--nice move. I've removed that information from the first two articles mentioned by Michig, but not St Margaret's--that really requires rollback and a careful look. Drmies (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Just a list that can be found elsewhere. No content, no nothing.  Majorly  talk  19:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.