Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leicester city ligers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Snow'ed in. No assertion of notability. CSD'ed twice, PROD'ed once. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  02:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Leicester city ligers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence that this pro dodgeball team is notable. Being mentioned in an article about a charity event doesn't cut it. Was speedied twice, with one contested prod.OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete inadequate evidence of WP:N--would be hapy to reconsider if more news sources or evidence of professional level added. JJL (talk) 00:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a pro team? It would help if there were notable awards, and citations to confirm this.  Syn  ergy 01:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence that they're considered notable. Do any news sources exist? Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 03:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of professional status. There is no notability guideline for sports teams as far as I can tell. There needs to be one. Applying WP:GNG shows no evidence of notability - one news article has a one-sentence mention. Brilliantine (talk) 03:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There is absolutely 0% chance that any professional dodgeball teams exist in the UK, where the sport as a whole is pretty much unknown other than from that movie. This is clearly just an amateur recreational team of no note - ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't believe Dodgeball is at a level where any teams in the UK merit an article. There appears to be no significant coverage of this team around. --Michig (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete they raised "£25'000"? No assertion of notability. Maybe they do exist, but all done by one editor ,smacks of conflict of interest. Darrenhusted (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.