Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leiden University College The Hague


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Kept & stubified. (non-admin closure)  Oxon Alex    - talk  13:40, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Leiden University College The Hague

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the sources currently in the article are WP:RS that are independent from the subject (they are all variations from the school's website). Taewangkorea (talk) 02:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Taewangkorea (talk) 02:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'll happily change my opinion if someone has the time to find reliable sources, which I don't think would be very hard, but right now it clearly fails WP:NSCHOOL as per nom. Mujinga (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment There are sources, like (in Dutch) and, but the article as it stands is too promotional. Perhaps stubbify? TSventon (talk) 10:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Question Taewangkorea, did you search for additional sources, as required by WP:BEFORE? If so, what did you find? TSventon (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and stubify. It's the international arm of a notable university system, so passes WP:NSCHOOL easily with the Dutch language sources provided above. The article is too heavily promotional and should be weeded accordingly.4meter4 (talk) 12:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and stubify per 4meter4. TSventon (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I would be open to stubbifying it. Taewangkorea (talk) 16:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.