Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Bennie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Leigh Bennie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches found nothing to suggest better sourcing, notability and improvement with the best results here, here and here. Her radio show may have also ended as the links are now dead and there's hasn't been any recent coverage. SwisterTwister  talk  06:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails General Notability. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  16:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Her notability predates today's social media hype. If she did what she did then today, there would be much more media and internet interest  available on Bennie.. KH29 (talk) 20:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)KH29
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  09:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That comment is irrelevant. She's a young woman, plus I couldn't find sources in print either. The bottom line is the quality of sources available. There are scant sources about her, which are not extensive, she thus fails WP:GNG; it's very simple. Wikipedia has absolutely nothing to do with "social media hype". Best, FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  17:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and FoCuS. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.