Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Killick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Leigh Killick

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NBIO, refs are passing mentions only, no in-depth coverage. This is a contested PROD, by the author who likely has a COI. MB 04:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC) why do you want to delete this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeighKWiki (talk • contribs) 05:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. MB 04:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Self-written by the man and wholly lacking any significant coverage. Note that Killick removed the AfD notice on his page, too. Don't disrupt the process, User:LeighKWiki. Why? I Ask (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry to break it to you, but it appears that you're not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article yet. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 05:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * can you not just allow this page because its a kind thing to do? -leigh — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeighKWiki (talk • contribs) 05:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * "Being kind" isn't a policy based rationale for keeping it. Why? I Ask (talk) 06:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * im sorry for deleting the code im new to this wikipedia thing but i strongly oppose this deletion i think it should be kept — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeighKWiki (talk • contribs) 05:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing notable, no sources found. No charted singles, no historical performances. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Added sources and notable info LeighKWiki (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - He has been mentioned very briefly a few times in articles that are about his cousin Matt Smith, but that does not mean he can write his own biographical article about his overwhelmingly average life and non-notable bedroom musical achievements. Outside of that family connection, which is itself irrelevant per WP:NOTINHERITED, I can find nothing on Killick beyond his own uploads. Good luck to dude as he gets started, but Wikipedia is not a promotional service. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 16:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and Wikipedia's job isn't to "be kind" to them by keeping the article anyway — musicians get articles by having coverage about them in reliable sources, demonstrating that they pass one or more of the notability criteria in WP:NMUSIC. But this claims absolutely nothing about Leigh Killick that would pass NMUSIC, and it's referenced to a YouTube performance clip and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of his cousin, not to any reliable or notability-building coverage in real media. Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform for aspiring future stars to promote themselves advertorially — it's an encyclopedia, on which making it comes first and then a Wikipedia article follows, rather than vice versa. Bearcat (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep i think you're cutting a bit deep here. this page is notable enough for a space here. it has not been used for promotional reasons and is strictly an archive of achievements and information LeighKWiki (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * One !vote per editor. -- Kinu t/c 21:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: LeighKWiki has repeatedly removed the AfD notice from the article. Can we simply close this discussion and stop wasting editors' time? Why? I Ask (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Response to comment i only did that because i didn't understand what it was i have not done it since. can we just keep this page up since it is notable enough and isnt false and simply for archival reasonsLeighKWiki (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * such a drag man like honestly — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeighKWiki (talk • contribs) 20:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It is indeed a drag... for us. This discussion is full of blue links to policies describing how someone does and does not get an article in Wikipedia. Explore them. Then put some of this energy into getting a gig. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 12:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Strong delete as blatant self-promotion and an attempt at notability by association. No evidence of substantive coverage in reliable sources upon which to base a BLP. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 21:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Extremely strong. Part hoax, part VERY non notable. Wikipedia is a encyclopaedia, not a platform for kids to tell lies about themselves. A 17 year old did not get Matt Smith into acting over 17 years ago. Lies and vanity. Delete and consider blocking for deliberately introducing false information. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * They already have been blocked. Why? I Ask (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - leaving aside the concerns noted above about self-promotion and the validity of some of the content of the article, the subject clearly does not currently have anything like the level of notability that would justify there being a Wikipedia article on them. Dunarc (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - The subject is clearly not notable enough to warrant having a Wikipedia page and this is a very obvious case of self-promotion. Also, it seems like the author moved this page from the Draft to the Article space by themselves without submitting it through the AfC page. ― Dulcetia&trade; 09:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Due to WP:PROMOTION. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.