Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Anderson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Leila Anderson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Shows no indication of notability and it promotional in tone. West Eddy (talk) 22:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete I don't think the article is promotional and there is indication of nobility. However... The original editor has created ~10 articles today of roughly the same quality. A majority have no independent references or reliable references. Anderson's article also lacks independent references. I'm unable to find reliable references about her, only brief mentions of her work. Bgwhite (talk) 05:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Keep: have found and added another ref, and I think there is probably plenty of coverage in less accessible sources (what proportion of South African newspapers are online?). This new editor has shown herself ready to learn (improved style of articles after I left a note on her talk page), and these articles should be given time to mature and find better refs. Pam D  08:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And have found another source from Independent Online (South Africa) which although brief gives high praise. Pam  D  08:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)



Delete While many of the original problems in this article have been revised, it does need some more work before it is ready for the main namespace. Some secondary sources were found and I do not think it is promotional in tone, but there is definitely room for more references and information. I moved a copy of this article into the WikiAfrica Incubator, so more experienced and knowledgeable users can contribute to the article before it gets moved back into the namespace. It's probably best to delete this version to avoid further confusion. --Megzmurphy (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.