Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Fletcher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Leila Fletcher

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is entirely unreferenced and the external links are marketing her products for sale. WP:NOTADVERT would seem to apply. Further, fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. 4meter4 (talk) 15:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   ArcAngel    (talk) 22:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music,  and Canada. Edward-Woodrow • talk 15:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:30, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. On a ProQuest search, I get a fair number of glancing namechecks of her piano coursebooks — a few times in reviews of Two Pianos Four Hands, once in a review of an Emily Haines album, that sort of thing — and on Newspapers.com I get her name popping up in ads for music stores selling the books, but I found absolutely SFA that was about her for the purposes of WP:GNG. An article about her would probably be keepable if it could be sourced properly, I'll grant, but I haven't been able to find anything that resembles proper sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 22:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I haven't been able to turn up any useful sources that could be used to confirm notability. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.