Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Khatami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Leila Khatami

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

She is not famous. Furthermore, she hasn't done anything special Bardia666 (talk) 16:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete but i would add that fame is not the issue, notability is. and i would not use the word "special". doesnt meet guidelines for academics, and notability is not inherited. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to have gained notability through academics per WP:ACADEMIC, and notability is not inherited from her father.  JUJUTACULAR  | (TALK) 17:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any non-trivial coverage in any language to meet WP:N. Neither could the editors over at Persian-language Wikipedia: fa:ویکی‌پدیا:رای‌گیری_برای_حذف/لیلا_خاتمی. Don't think she meets WP:ACADEMIC. cab (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There are some evidences to call as notable. It is also a stub --Donotask-donottell (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The weblinks you added are just links to Google searches and don't show any notability. The single Google Books hit is just a guy writing a math textbook who said thank you to her. The Google Scholar hits show her most-cited paper as having 11 citations. The Google News hits are just brief quotes by her discussing her father, not articles about her. The regular Google search doesn't have any reliable sources. And it doesn't matter whether this article is a stub or thousands of words long --- that has nothing to do with whether it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. cab (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If that is your argument, I would say there is no consistency how we call someone notable on wikipedia. Here is a page Mallika Chopra and many more. May a be a few that I wrote. --Donotask-donottell (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:WAX. We are not talking about the other three million pages, we are talking about this page, and when we come to AfD there is great consistency in how we deal with pages: we find multiple, non-trivial sources about a topic, or we delete the article. cab (talk) 01:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That I will call as biased unless we fix all those anomalies. As a mathematician she may not be wiki notable, but she is daughter of the former Iranian President. That is importnat to the current international politics. She may have a potential to become a noted politician of Iran and a good mathematician. I do not know why we are in a hurry to wipe her out from wiki. Thanks. --Donotask-donottell (talk) 02:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence that the article meets WP:PROF. CronopioFlotante (talk) 22:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Khatami is listed by Northeastern as a postdoc . This is strong evidence that she does not pass WP:PROF. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 02:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on above evidence. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.