Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leimin Duong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Leimin Duong

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO. Could not find significant coverage. Establishing a beer company or being on 100 Women (BBC) doesn't confer automatic notability. LibStar (talk) 01:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  05:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  05:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  05:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. دَستخَط، اِفلاق  (کَتھ باتھ) 08:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Gnews has one hit in a Dutch/Belgian newspaper and one in Vietnamese. She founded a brewery but hasn't risen above others who have done something similar it seems. Oaktree b (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Compared to Helana Sawires I think there is not quite enough yet, and the subject does get a bit more than a passing mention in multiple languages, hence TOOSOON.  There is some sourcing available showing some leaning towards BASIC but there is not enough.  Aoziwe (talk) 10:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The coverage in The Daily Telegraph and Sydney Morning Herald passes IRS, but possibly it's not enough to meet GNG, I've certainly seen worse refs and the pages survived-- I could go either way on this one. Cabrils (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.