Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lele Pons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Lele Pons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Okay just had it as a prod but decided to change it as she does not seem notable at all (and interesting that this links to a sock puppet report) Wgolf (talk) 21:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N, no evidence of notability.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  02:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, although I agree the previous version of the article failed many of Wikipedia's guidelines, still, hopefully these problems are fixed, references added. So, why should we keep this article? It's this crazy new medium -- Vine -- with its six-second loops, well guess what, Pons is a star in this new medium which is even beginning to have its own awards so it won't be long before Vine celebrities are up on the dias, teary-eyed, holding goldish statue-junk and boring the rest of the world senseless. Pons is leading the pack in terms of Vine 'plays' and there are sufficient references suggesting notability such as here and Streamy award nominee here and rave review here and nominated for award and in-depth source here and here and in-depth source here that I think we can keep her article here in Wikipedia PROVIDED OF COURSE that she does not prank any Wikipedians, like it would be personally upsetting if she pranked our lord-chief-all-high-master of the WORLD OF TRUE FACTS Jimmy Wales. And, of course, if she's 17, probably she's applying to colleges, and I hope she considers the greatest college in the world.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, there seems to be sufficient mention in media. Sjö (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 10:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, seems to meet WP:GNG, but I personally would keep the page as a monument of the craziness of today's world, for future generations. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 12:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.