Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lelia Goldoni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus for the article to be retained. North America1000 07:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Lelia Goldoni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 03:09, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an article on a living person that has no reliable sources. IMDb is not a reliable source and has even been know to include articles on fictitious people made up to create publicity for films. Not that I am saying Goldoni is fictitious, but I am saying we lack any reliable sources on her.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Kpgj  hpjm  05:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:44, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: a couple of book sources added, though still needs better sourcing. Pam  D  13:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  05:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relist to allow both consideration of added sources as well as specific consideration of if specific criteria of WP:NACTOR has been satisfied
 * Keep I found more sources and added them. I'm not going to have time to do more at the moment. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:BASIC Cori  D  13:06, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject's career is definitely uneven, and many of the credits are not helpful for establishing notability, but subject passes WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple notable films. Roles are verifiable in academic and reference books on cinema, as a Google Books search confirms. Bakazaka (talk) 20:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bakazaka/WP:NACTOR based on new sources added.  originalmess  how u doin that busta rhyme? 01:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: meets WP:NACTOR. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article has been much improved by Megalibrarygirl and seems to meet WP:NACTOR. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:HEY, clearly passes WP:NACTOR now Atlantic306 (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets NACTOR and GNG. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 23:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.