Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemon Cohen

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:54, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Lemon Cohen
Four unique Google hits. RickK 08:25, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. r3m0t talk 08:27, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 08:36, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the 6000+ people at Victoria University would know who he is - he is not much less notable than Critical Critic. I think I know who wrote it and it wasn't him. At worst, perhaps could be merged with Salient (magazine) ?
 * Unsigned vote by 203.79.97.94 (talk &middot; contributions). – flamurai (t)
 * Delete. Too localized. Not notable to the average encyclopedia reader. – flamurai (t) 10:37, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN. Radiant_* 10:57, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Oh, and make that three unique Google hits.  One of them doesn't even refer to this person. Chris 20:24, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Suzanne takes you down/ to her place near the river/ you can hear the boats go by/ as we delete this crap forever... -R. fiend 03:53, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Two-sentence article about a college student columnist who has been at the job, evidently, for about a year. Not notable, probably vanity. Jonathunder 05:03, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. &#8212; Sesel wa  10:28, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. So long, Lemon. Vlad M V  &#1645; talk 14:31, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.