Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Len Cabral


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep thanks to a good WP:HEY. Consensus seems to be clear ever since RebeccaGreen added the new sources. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Len Cabral
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources; searching does not find significant in-depth independent coverage. There are a few mentions in local Rhode Island newspapers but little else. Does not meet WP:CREATIVE MB 15:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  16:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  01:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:11, 16 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no significant sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:BASIC. I have added 7 references, from newspapers in Boston, New Mexico, Massachusetts and Ireland, as well as a book. I have also found reviews in the journal The Second Story Review (still to add), and there may well be more, so he may meet WP:CREATIVE too. There is certainly more information about him available in these sources than is included in this article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep on the basis of two worthwhile sources, i.e. the Boston Globe (here) and the Hartford Courant (here and here). There's little else that qualifies as a significant source but this seems to suffice. -The Gnome (talk) 12:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as subject meets WP:BASIC with identified sources. Thanks to for putting in the work. Bakazaka (talk) 03:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.