Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lena Paul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Lena Paul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: the current references are porn/adult product vendor websites, interviews and database entries. I looked for additional sources and didn't find any in-depth, reliable and independent biographical coverage. Her anti-Trump social media postings received a bit of news attention; she's also quoted in one Jezebel article on pornography and mentioned in passing in two others. She also gets a number of passing mentions because Kanye West used a picture of her in his pornography-inspired fashion collection, as well as assorted other namedrops and tabloid coverage. She won a Pornhub Award in 2018, which doesn't count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. She was also ranked #99 in a 2017 Complex listicle, "The Top 100 Hottest Porn Stars (Right Now)". Cheers, gnu 57 19:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57  19:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu 57  19:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57  19:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. gnu 57  19:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable pornographic entertainer. This is one profession where we are still plagued with over coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:35, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of reliable secondary source coverage. The references are junk sources like XRentDVD, interviews and press releases. An independent search for reliable sources yielded only more porn trade press releases.  Sources are of too poor a quality to claim notability per WP:BASIC or WP:ENT. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I've looked at this about five times, trying to decide if she is notable. I think insufficient depth of coverage satisfies a delete.  scope_creep Talk  15:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.