Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lena Yada (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Lena Yada
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Second nomination. First, Mrs Yada save her ass because she was in WWE. Now: she was in WWE as a no-wrestler role. A few month with a mic and she was fired. After this, she disappeared from wrestling. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Regardless of her wrestling career, she seems to also have some notability as a model and surfer. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * 'Commentary That's the thing. I think that his career in wrestling isn't enough to make an article and I don't know if her career as a model and surfer is enough.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: If we made an article for every model with a similar resumé,  we'd have a few thousand more stubs with hardly any content (or traffic for that matter). This just isn't  notable enough for the encyclopedia .  Feed  back  ☎ 00:05, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The first AFD for this topic resulted in a resounding keep. Nothing has changed over the last 4 years except that she has received even more coverage. Let's not forget WP:NTEMP. When meeting the primary notability guideline for the entirety of her life and work, we need not then look to any of the many SNGs to decide if one of them is failed. being "notable enough for the encyclopedia" is based upon coverage in reliable sources, and not upon wax comparisons to "every model with a similar resumé". If these hypothetical others have similar extensive coverage, they could merit an article too.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Commentary The first afd has commentaries like this. "a professional wrestler appearing on one of the major programs is notable", " being on TV every week and being seen by millions of people", "she is active in the WWE". She don't work since 2008 in WWE and didn't nothing in any wrestling company, surfing nor modeling. Still notable? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * She wasn't notable then, and she isn't notable now. The decision of whether a subject is notable depends entirely on consensus, and consensus can change. Feed  back  ☎ 07:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - per MichaelQSchmidt. Also, seems she is notable for things outside of the ring as well.LordMaldad2000 (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * About that, I should clarify that I didn't mean she's particularly notable as any one of those three things. But when those three questionably notable careers combine, you get a more solidly notable person who's more than the sum of her parts. WP:CAPTAINPLANET. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.