Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Lenar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP: NCOMPANY. The article gives no indication of importance, and has been tagged as unsourced for over seven years. As noted by Delete votes in the previous AfD (which was closed as no consensus), the company's only notable work is the game Deadly Towers, which by itself does not pass on notability to the company. Martin IIIa (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 12:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Keep - The company has developed at least one commercially successful game and a number of lesser ones. Also, they appear to have a longer history than what the article indicates. This GiantBomb page indicates that they changed their name to Astroll in 1997 and developed several other games afterwards. I also found this page which lists some Japanese sources for more information. This article needs some more research but it's in line with other small developer articles that have been kept. --Posted by Pikamander2   (Talk)  at 10:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:INHERIT. I also don't buy the WP:MUSTBESOURCES argument. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing ++ 15:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.