Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lennart Augustsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  10:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Lennart Augustsson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not the subject of significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a Google books search. A redirect to LPMud could be useful—he is mentioned there in greater length than in Haskell—but his other works are not independently notable so there isn't an obvious redirect target. czar 00:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 *  Weak Delete . A GS h-index of 20 in the highly cited area computer science (with some high cited papers) may be WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Keep. I think 8 publications with >100 citations is enough for WP:PROF, especially for someone who seems known better as an implementer than as an academic computer scientist. He is also prominently mentioned on Bluespec, LPMud, and Lazy ML, which are different enough from each other (and individually notable enough) that I don't think Walled garden is relevant. This variety of contributions also makes the nominator's suggestion of a redirect a bad idea. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Well cited, known for other things. Basically, I find David's arguments compelling. Fieari (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per David Eppstein. —Ruud 11:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep but add more content to it. --Pachisu124 (talk) 18:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yet we still have no source that covers him in any significant detail czar  19:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.