Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lennie Clark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Lennie Clark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:BIO. I dream of horses (C) @ 04:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (C) @  04:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (C) @  04:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – fails BLPNOTE and GNG Flat Out (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – a huge number of internal Wikipedia links have ben added and it's no longer an orphan. Plus it's only one day old. Give it some time to become a fully fleshed-out page. Check back next week: guarantee it will be of really high quality. 03:22, 29 September 2015 (MST)
 * Delete per nom, BIO and GNG. If (highly unlikely) he gets elected, then he would be notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Unelected candidates for office do not get articles just for being candidates, per WP:NPOL — if you cannot make and properly source a credible claim that he would already have been eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before becoming a candidate for office, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if he wins. Bearcat (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails BLPNOTE and GNG -- fairly blatant self-promo, maybe for next run. Quis separabit?  15:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.