Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3s


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to IdeaPad. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3s

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. This article is just advertising of an un-notable notebook computer. Not every consumer product is notable enough to get a Wikipedia article.No hits on Google Books for this model, and even the S10 only gets the usual product placements. Wtshymanski (talk) 04:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note advertising-like features of the text, such as praising the slimness of the product...and look, it's even got a manufacturer's suggested list price. --Wtshymanski (talk) 04:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to IdeaPad. As the reviews linked to the article point out, this is not even a new product, just an upgrade, so let's just upgrade the IdeaPad article, too. Sources provided and ghits are primary, sales sites, consumer reviews. WP:NOTCATALOG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to IdeaPad. Models are only notable and noteworthy if there's some distinctive feature to them. This looks like a notable range, but not a notably individual model. Maybe some WP:CRYSTAL too. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator Sure, a merge would work and is less trouble than a deletion. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.