Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenovo K3 Note


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lenovo_smartphones. Nothing reliably sourced to merge, but feel free to pilfer from the article history. czar 12:51, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Lenovo K3 Note

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG: no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". -- Irn (talk) 17:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Redirect/merge to Lenovo smartphones. I do find valid sources that establish notability they include newspapers like the Times of India, independent review sites etc. DeVerm (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: thank you Tigraan; the orphan tag put me on the wrong path (I removed it from the article). I agree that it is much better merged with the Lenovo smartphones article. When we strip all the promotional text then we are left with what is already in that article, even including camera resolution, but I'm sure somebody can distill some useful data from the article so I will leave the option of merging open as well.
 * Spot on. I think a brutal redirect is enough, but I will not fight about the fine print of how much of the article is merged. (FWIW the camera resolution is in my view on the bad side of the grey line) Tigraan Click here to contact me 17:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to Lenovo smartphones. There are sources, but per WP:PRODUCT, we should not keep product-stubs when a merge is suitable (Avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product (...)).
 * The article is not a stub right now, but if we remove promotional material (making its display gorgeous, amazing headphone experience) and the overly-detailed technical details (is the front camera's resolution really encyclopedic detail?), not much remains. Tigraan Click here to contact me 13:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.