Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenovo OneLink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Lenovo OneLink

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear notable enough for a separate article. Rockstone Send me a message!  22:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC) See also Lenovo OneLink+. -- Rockstone  Send me a message!  00:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Rockstone  Send me a message!  22:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability present or found via BEFORE. Should have remained in draftspace but there was some weird edits around that with creator describing himself/his objection in the third person. Not mentioned at Lenovo, so a redirect wouldn't help the reader. Star   Mississippi  22:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Creator is entitled to refuse move to draft and this should be respected but must then expect AfD; and I see no evidence of notability presented and if creator forces back a stub into mainspace, arguably dsiruptively, in this state the're unlilkely to gather volunteer resource support in deep searches. It is unfortunate Articles for deletion/Lenovo OneLink+ was not bundled at the same time but very easy for the nominator not to spot it.  I'm willing to change me !vote if something significant appears. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.