Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenovo s650


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The article is completely unsourced even after being listed for deletion for weeks. WP:V mandates deletion. The two "keep" opinions do not address the policy-based deletion rationale and are discounted. This does not prevent a sourced recreation.  Sandstein  16:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Lenovo s650

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP is WP:NOT a product brief site with every product with its features. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - technology hardware of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up brief coverage listing the specifications, but no significant in-depth reviews / RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 04:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep - Article created this month. Tag it for notability, use WP:PROD or just give it time to develop. ~KvnG 14:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  → Call me  Hahc  21  16:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - per Kvng. I think cleanup is required, as well as a list of references. I'll fix the obvious spelling mistakes for now. Dmatteng (talk) 16:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.